Salamabad: During the hearing of the Panama case, Justice Azmat Saeed has remarked that not to attack the JIT results, but answer their documents and the case of counterfeit documents has broken my heart.A three-member special bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan heard the Panama execution case. In the beginning of the hearing, the Supreme Court expressed its intense disturbance on the presence of Salman Akram Raja before submitting documents before the court, Justice Ejaz Afzal told Salman Akram Raja that all your documents have been discussed in the media, You have fought your case in the media, outside the media diameter, go and make arguments, on which Salma Akram Raja replied that the media did not give documents to them.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that a document relates to Qatari princes and a British Virgin Islands, Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that both documents will be opened in court, all documents will be given to the media only, Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan gave remarks that he did not know what is in linear letter.
Also read this news: The Sharif's mini-trail's reply did not come till today, the Supreme Court
Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan remarked that Mary Nawaz's lawyer had denied the mineral documents in the court on which Salman Akram said that JIT did not comply with Hussain Nawaz on the response of Dubai authorities, the UAE department See the letter of justice on which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan gave remarks that the JIT filed his verdict with Justice, on which Salman Akram Raja asked Hussain Nawaz about Dubai's documents. Must have gone Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said in the remarks that Hussain Nawaz's documents were requested from the United Arab Emirates.
During the hearing, Salman Akram Raja read the letter of the UAE's Ministry of Justice and said that the UAE authorities did not respond to the record of Gulf Steel Mills Agreement, 12 million Darma transactions were also denied, the letter was denied. I was told that there is no custom record of the transfer of machinery, where Justice Azmat Saeed said in the remarks that the UAE authorities had said that this seal is not ours.
Salman Akram Raja said that there was some misunderstanding on which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan asked Remarks that Hussain Nawaz and Tariq Shafi asked if he said that we did not comment, everyone said it did not know the notary seal. These documents are incorrect, it was asked that Hussain Nawaz had confirmed with the Notary Public, Hussain Nawaz told JIT that he did not go to Dubai. The second was confirmed by the Notary Public, so that the documents seem to be fake, which But Salman Akram said that there was no other notice for Hussain Nawaz's position, JIT did not appear to be on Hussain Nawaz, on which Justice Ejaz al-Khas We have remarked that we are asking you to tell us your position on which Salman Akram said that UAE officials will have a serious mistake. Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that you should provide all records to the JIT, now you have brought new documents, now see that their cases will be affected.
Remarks by Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that both the two North Korean public officials of the Notary Public May 12, 1988 and May 30, were banned, Dubai officials refused to go to Scrap Jeddah on which Salman Akram Raja said that it was not a scrap. The IT questioned the wrong questions on which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that if Dubai does not have an entry then what is the need for customs department Dubai, on which Salman Akram Raja said that from one state to another, Would happen Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that is the delivery certificate of the machinery certified, but Salman Akram Raja said that the court can also give certified documents if it is respected.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that the documents given by you did not include the details of the mile, Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that when the question is raised, the documents bring. Salman Akram said that before the transfer of machinery, no one has expressed doubt about which the remarks have been made by Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan, that the space was done on time, Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that the document was filed with JIT This point was taken in response to the report. Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that you bring a document of tie tank so that we may, in private documents, it can also be written that goods went to the tie tank, bring a certified document, write you the results that They have no status and status.
Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that not to conduct the results of the JIT and respond to their documents, which said that Akram Raja, a bank record of Azizi Steel Mill, is also present on the basis of which the remarks were given. At the time there were no survivors on Azizi, Salman Akram said that those who were outstanding were paid, the court remarked that according to the documents, 21 million rupees of Azizi were outstanding at the time of sale, Salman Akram Raja said. The documents were obtained from sources, JIT has said that Azizi Steel Mill is 42 million instead of 63 million dollars. Already sold 63 million rupees, came to Azizi's account, whose bank record was available on which Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that this bank had brought the record, so that the other Salman Akram said that point That 63 million came into my account Salman Akram Raja said that there was some misunderstanding on which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan asked Remarks that Hussain Nawaz and Tariq Shafi asked if he said that we did not comment, everyone said it did not know the notary seal. These documents are incorrect, it was asked that Hussain Nawaz had confirmed with the Notary Public, Hussain Nawaz told JIT that he did not go to Dubai. The second was confirmed by the Notary Public, so that the documents seem to be fake, which But Salman Akram said that there was no other notice for Hussain Nawaz's position, JIT did not appear to be on Hussain Nawaz, on which Justice Ejaz al-Khas We have remarked that we are asking you to tell us your position on which Salman Akram said that UAE officials will have a serious mistake. Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that you should provide all records to the JIT, now you have brought new documents, now see that their cases will be affected. Remarks by Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that both the two North Korean public officials of the Notary Public May 12, 1988 and May 30, were banned, Dubai officials refused to go to Scrap Jeddah on which Salman Akram Raja said that it was not a scrap. The IT questioned the wrong questions on which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that if Dubai does not have an entry then what is the need for customs department Dubai, on which Salman Akram Raja said that from one state to another, Would happen Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that is the delivery certificate of the machinery certified, but Salman Akram Raja said that the court can also give certified documents if it is respected. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that the documents given by you did not include the details of the mile, Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that when the question is raised, the documents bring. Salman Akram said that before the transfer of machinery, no one has expressed doubt about which the remarks have been made by Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan, that the space was done on time, Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that the document was filed with JIT This point was taken in response to the report. Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that you bring a document of tie tank so that we may, in private documents, it can also be written that goods went to the tie tank, bring a certified document, write you the results that They have no status and status. Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that not to conduct the results of the JIT and respond to their documents, which said that Akram Raja, a bank record of Azizi Steel Mill, is also present on the basis of which the remarks were given. At the time there were no survivors on Azizi, Salman Akram said that those who were outstanding were paid, the court remarked that according to the documents, 21 million rupees of Azizi were outstanding at the time of sale, Salman Akram Raja said. The documents were obtained from sources, JIT has said that Azizi Steel Mill is 42 million instead of 63 million dollars. Already sold 63 million rupees, came to Azizi's account, whose bank record was available on which Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that this bank had brought the record, so that the other Salman Akram said that point That 63 million came into my account Justice Zulfiqar Saeed remarked that on the other hand, my life is not so easy. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that the daughter of Hussain, Abbas and Shahbaz Sharif's daughter Azizi were part of Steel Mills, Justice Azmat Saeed said in his remarks that the date of the case is that there are payments from secret places, Salman Akram said. That JIT wanted to ask them. Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that if asked by the advertisement in the newspaper, Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan gave remarks that Hussain Nawaz sold Azizi only. Has Hussain Nawaz bought shares of both the participants, Hussein Nawaz The Power of Attorney has not been submitted till today, but Salman Akram said that I was saying that it was a family matter whose written reply was not available, but Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that the first time the Power of Attorney was present Is it possible to prove that the rest of the people were given part of the report, which Salman Akram Raja said said that JIT has questioned this question. Did not ask Witnesses can be called on the issue of Azizi's sales, the other two partners did not challenge Azizi's sales, the allegation that Hassan, Husain could not buy London flat in 1993, on which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that Prime Minister's children live in London Flats since 1993, till then we could not find the source of income and mini trail. Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that London Flats are Nelson and Nashol, there is no dispute, Nelson, Nissol's first beer certificate, then converted into ownership, is not a Trusted Dead on the record of Mozic Fanska's record. Salman Akram Raja, whose owner, said that the charge is to be owned by Mary Nawaz. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that this is not the case as per the document, according to Mojack Phoneska, owner of Mary Flats. Salman Akram said that he says Mary is the owner, we say Hussain is the owner, not the difference, but Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that there is a lot of difference if Mary is the owner, then we will also see the funds. Salman Akram Raja said that he would also be seen in the matter of Hussein, which was given by the judge, Ejaz Afzal, that the age of children in 93 shows that they can not buy flat, the allegations that the flat prime minister Purchased, applicants say the prime minister's funds. Justice Azmat Saeed gave his remarks that if we have blamed us, it is said that the accused (Nain Avenue) is accused of corruption and corrupt practices, which the remarks made by Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan gave the allegation. That's not the kids. Lawyer Salman Akram Raja said that Mary, Hasan and Husain did not do anything wrong only received her shares. Justice Ejaz Afzal remarked that the fact that flat Hussain Nawaz got acquainted, allegations that Mary is in prime minister's prime minister, Naeem Bukhari says that if Mary will not speak the truth with the court, it will be the result. Justice Ejazullah has remarked that Mary is also accused of submitting the court in court. Justice Azmat Saeed gave his remarks that Mrs. Akram Raja Chakri proceeded. Justice Ejaz Afzal remarked that if you are not blamed for why you are spending your energy. Justice Ejaz Afzal remarked that the burden of proving flat flames will be on public office holders. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that he did not have the answers to the funds, Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that he did not know whether he would do it, Hassan, Hussein and Mary's money would come to know. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan remarked that there is no mention of the flagship and the Azizi steel mill in the letter letter. During the hearing, the court opened Hamad bin Jasmine and the BBI document, which included two posts sent to JIT. Justice Salman Akram said that the JIT has concluded that Hamza bin Jasem's interview is not needed, Justice Ejaz Afzal remarked that the court has said that the decision is to be done on the document, you are giving arguments that the case further It has been investigated. Salman Akram said, "I am just saying that there should be complete inquiry, Mohammad Sharif administered money to Hassan and Husain in his life," remarked that Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that you said the new thing Do it Salman Akram Raja
No comments:
Post a Comment